Lectrogram - Issue 6
Author: Lectromec
Published: 03-01-2005
Lectromec
LECTROGRAM©
March
2005 Newsletter
A Resource for your Wire Maintenance Program
A United Airlines B767-300 on a Jan. 9, 1998 flight,
from Zurich to Washington DC, was forced to execute an emergency
landing at London’s Heathrow airport because of a food chiller
unit improperly installed in the electronic and equipment bay. A
jagged edge on the chiller scraped wire insulation as the chiller was
pushed into position. The result was wholesale arcing damage.
This is just one of several events that highlighted the need for more
attention to be paid to the maintenance of wiring systems on an
aircraft and illustrated that inattention to these details can affect
the airworthiness of an entire airplane.

A Risk Analysis Tool (RAT™) has been developed
for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to aid aircraft
manufactures and maintenance personnel in the continued airworthiness
of their aircraft. This tool introduces a fresh perspective to
the maintenance and upkeep of Electrical Wire Interconnect System
(EWIS). Problems and malfunctions of the wiring systems are broken
down into categories, each identifying specific levels on which
malfunctions can occur and to what degree of severity.
Implementation of the RAT™ requires us to introduce three types
of EWIS failures: wire level, bundle level, and zonal level.

At the wire level, insulation breaches
can have effects ranging from degraded function to eroded safety
margins. Because most wires are routed in groups, or bundles,
adjacent wires in a bundle are often subjected to similar types of
environmental and mechanical strains. Consequently, these adjacent
breaks may increase the likelihood of cascading damage.
At the bundle level, an insulation break can lead to
arcing, and failure of many wires in the bundle. Depending on the
number of systems to which the wires are connected, this type of
spreading damage can wipe out functions and force the aircrew into
emergency procedures. If not already tripped, circuit breakers may
have to be pulled, smoke evacuation and fire fighting equipment put
into action. The repair effort involves time, expertise and cost to
return the airplane to airworthy condition.
At the zonal level, or damage that
extends across multiple bundles, the problems are worse. Failures at
the zonal level can completely negate fail-safe design and built in
redundancy features. The electronics and equipment bay, typically
located below the cockpit, is a notable case in point. The sheer
concentration of power feeder cables, signal wires and the end-use
components to which they are connected makes the E&E bay
particularly vulnerable.

The RAT™ facilitates evaluation
of a particular wiring layout. Evaluation can be done during original
design to assure adequate separation and segregation of aircraft
wiring, thereby minimizing the potential for single point failure.
The tool can also be used for assessing the safety of modifications
to the original layout, as might be the case in the supplemental type
certificate (STC) process.
By identifying the function, length and
type of every wire on the airplane, its proximity to potentially
volatile fixtures (fuel tanks and hydraulic lines), and its exposure
to the elements, the RAT™ can calculate the failure rate per
foot of wire per flight hour. This metric will prove extremely useful
in choosing the wire installation procedure that will satisfy the
planned service life of an aircraft.
By
identifying EWIS failures at the wire, bundle and zonal level, we can
change the way we think about the continued airworthiness of an
aircraft. Implementation of the RAT™ tool requires that
all personnel understand the importance of wiring maintenance and the
circumstances that contribute to EWIS failure.