Lectrogram - Issue 12
Author: Lectromec
Published: 09-01-2006
Lectromec
LECTROGRAM©
September
2006 Newsletter
A Resource for your Wire
Maintenance Program
Recent years have shown increased talk
of arcing and the possible damage to aircraft. There have been
many examples of these events on aircraft. Recently compiled
data from the FAA indicates that between the years 1999 and 2004,
there was an average of more than 20 reported electrical arcing
events per year on commercial aircraft. The actual number may
be higher as these events are underreported.
Because of the large impact that an
arcing event can have on continued airworthiness, significant efforts
have been made to understand and mitigate damage done by arcs; arc
resistant wire insulation and arc fault circuit breakers are examples
of some of this hard work.
In discussions of arcing events, two
different classifications of arcing have been recognized: parallel
arcing and series arcing. Parallel arcing is often what is
thought of when the term ‘arcing’ is used. It is
characterized by a large discharge of energy that can cause large
amounts of damage in only a few seconds. On the other hand,
series arcing is more subtle but can still generate significant heat.
This can lead to severe problems including insulation
deterioration, false tripping of thermal circuit breakers or the more
dramatic secondary effects of parallel arcing.

Series arcing starts with a poor
connection of the conductors. The poor connection may be due to
a loose terminal or crimp, corrosion, or dirt in a connection.
This leads to the connection between the current carrying wire and
terminal being made and broken repeatedly, sometimes many times a
second. The vibration environment on a plane exacerbates the
problem. In rare occasions, series arcing can occur when there
is a break in a conductor inside of the insulation.

As the connection breaks, a small arc
is drawn between the two contacts, it then disappears quickly as the
distance between the conductors becomes too large. Though the
duration of the arcing event is short, the power dissipated from the
arc into the structure is much larger than there would be in a normal
tight connection. This energy heats the conductors. If the
frequency of the circuit interruption is low, then the energy
dissipated will be low and the temperature rise of both contacts will
be small. However, if the frequency is high enough, the energy
discharged by the arcing can heat the conductors to a high
temperature.
Difference between
series and parallel arcing
In a series arc, the arc comes from
interruption in a single circuit, and so the load of that circuit
limits the current. That is, all of the current in the arc must
also go through the load as well. The arc is in “series”
with the load. For a typical circuit using 20-gauge wire the
current is limited to between 1 to 5 amps.
In a parallel arc (the more dramatic
type), the current goes from one wire directly to the structure
(ground) or a second wire that is at a different voltage (ground or a
different phase in the case of a three-phase system). The
current in the arc does not go through the ‘complete’
circuit and therefore is not limited by the load; the arc is in
“parallel” with the load. Only the resistance in
the arc, the resistance of wire and the internal impedance of the
power source limit the current in the arc. For a typical
circuit using 20-gauge wire, the current can be between 50 and 100
amps or higher.
Both types of arcing, while they vary
in the duration and types of damage that can be expected, can reduce
the effectiveness of electrical components as well as cause damage to
nearby objects that are not part of the system. Series arcing
can damage insulation and may lead to the more damaging parallel
arcing. Ensuring that termination points for wires are properly
secured with the correct size terminal lugs can minimize the risks of
series arcing.
Copyright
©2006 Lectromechanical Design Company