Answering Reader Mail - 3Q2008
Author: Jim Burns
Published: 11-07-2008
Answering Reader Mail
Third Quarter 2008
November 7, 2008
Author: Jim Burns – WireFacts.com contributing
Author
For time to time, I get some basic questions from Wirefacts.com
readers that should be included as part of the general understanding
provided by the website. To accommodate this, I have answered
some of these questions and have posted the responses below.
What are some of the steps that exist which people should take
when selecting wire?
First and most importantly, understand the conditions in which the
wire will be operating. Common applications can use just about
any wire, so long as the wire is sized correctly for electrical
current of the device. If the wire is to be exposed to extended
periods of high temperature, it is better to select a wire that is
rated for a temperature 20-30% higher; this handles cases in which
the device is outside normal operation. Additionally, this will
eliminate any concern about variations inherent to the wire
manufacturing process which might reduce the longevity of the wire
when subjected to high temperatures.
Next, consider the fluids with which the wire might come in
contact with. Some materials have a sharp drop in effectiveness
and longevity when in contact with strong alkaline solutions.
Lastly, consider the amount of abrasion to which the wire will be
subjected. High vibration areas can put additional strain on
wires at clamps. Dependent on the amount of vibration, consider
a thicker gauge wire and/or one with an insulation with a greater
resistance to chafing.
When should additional protection (like harnesses protection
sleeves or conduits) be used?
For most standard operations (inside benign stationary low-traffic
environments), the use of additional protection is not necessary, but
as the conditions deviate more from this, additional protection may
need to be considered. High-traffic environments (in terms of
personnel) are the most common reason that additional protection is
employed, thereby limiting the chance for an individual to make
direct contact with the wire bundle.
The one thing to remember about additional harness protections is
that they can make locating a problem more difficult. Wire
failures within long conduits can be difficult to access.
Fabric harnesses protection schemes (used on wires that need
additional protection but also must be flexible – such as
disconnects, doors, and equipment panels) can mask the damage to
wires found at the flex points.
What is the best way to determine the consequences of wire
failure?
This really does depend on the application. For small
projects, the consequence of a wire failure can be assessed rather
quickly and the necessary steps to mitigate potential of harm can be
a straight forward as ensuring proper grounding.
For medium scale (large hobby or small commercial) projects, it
might be useful to handle the problem with a fault tree. There
are some open source solutions which are simple enough for small
scale projects (http://www.openfta.com/).
Some knowledge of basic fault tree structure is necessary, but
the necessary ideas can be learned in a short time with relative
ease. The creation of a fault tree is significantly easier if
the started with the project; more time and patience is necessary in
the evaluation of wiring systems for retrofits or existing product
modifications.
For large scale projects, there are commercial software packages
that specialize in the risk assessment of wiring systems. Items
like the EWIS RAT (http://www.lectromec.org/EWISRAT.html)
are directed toward the investigation of all aspects of the wiring
system. All aspects of the wiring system can be put into the
program and reports, such as collocation analyses and damage
assessments can be automatically generated. Though there is an
initial cost to gather the information the first time, the benefit
exists for continued updating of the information as changes to the
design are made.
That’s it for today. Keep your questions coming, I
will post my responses once I get a sufficient number.